NEED A PERFECT PAPER? PLACE YOUR FIRST ORDER AND SAVE 15% USING COUPON:

Assessment Description Leadership is a complex process that requires leaders to critically appraise the circumstances in which they find themselves to best

Assessment Description Leadership is a complex process that requires leaders to critically appraise the circumstances in which they find themselves to best

Click here to Order a Custom answer to this Question from our writers. It’s fast and plagiarism-free.

Assessment Description Leadership is a complex process that requires leaders to critically appraise the circumstances in which they find themselves to best determine how to lead and influence those around them. There are multiple tactics a leader can employ in any given circumstance to influence a situation or their followers. Compare two leaders you have dealt with in the past.  What different tactics did these leaders employ to influence situations or people?  Which tactics were successful? Which tactics were not successful? As a leader, how can you critically appraise situations to make sure you select appropriate tactics for influencing a given situation?

A leader has access to plethora of tactics to influence its followers and to be used in numerous situations. Cohen, (2000) has recognized eight crucial tactics that leaders might use in circumstances to sway a group of followers irrespective of leadership styles. The eight essential leadership tactics are: direction, persuasion, negotiation, involvement, indirection, enlistment, redirection, and reputation (Cohen, 2000). 

I have had many supervisors in my different careers.  The two most recent leaders that I have worked with have used different tactics to influence situations or people. My favorite leader of the two made the call for change and explained why if there were concerns, he will say let’s try and if it doesn’t work, we will change it. It usually worked on his favor he was fun and made work fun. When things will not go well, he always had the right plan and even when his plans didn’t work, he had the right words to lift our spirits. 

The other leader that I respected had a more direct approached, he will make changes and when met resistance it was his way or the highway, but he will work shoulder to shoulder with his team and he was well respected.  During my time working with him things went smooth and you could always be assured that everything was done fairly. 

Both tactics where successful but the fact that the first leader was always willing to hear you out caused staff to really like him and work for him. 

A leader, should always take in consideration the two sides, gather as much information as possible, and make a balance decision.

Refrence:

Cohen, W. A. (2000). The new art of the leader. U.S.: Prentice Hall Direct Topic 1 DQ 2

Leadership is a complex process that requires leaders to critically appraise the circumstances in which

they find themselves to best determine how to lead and influence those around them. There are

multiple tactics a leader can employ in any given circumstance to influence a situation or their followers.

Compare two leaders you have dealt with in the past. What different tactics did these leaders employ to

influence situations or people? Which tactics were successful? Which tactics were not successful? As a

leader, how can you critically appraise situations to make sure you select appropriate tactics for

influencing a given situation?

A leader has access to plethora of tactics to influence its followers and to be used in numerous
situations. Cohen, (2000) has recognized eight crucial tactics that leaders might use in
circumstances to sway a group of followers irrespective of leadership styles. The eight essential
leadership tactics are: direction, persuasion, negotiation, involvement, indirection, enlistment,
redirection, and reputation (Cohen, 2000).

I have had many supervisors in my different carriers but one that I would call a true leader only
4. The two most recent leaders that I have worked with have used different tactics to influence
situations or people. My favorite leader of the two made the call for change and explained why
if there was concerns, he will say let’s try and if it doesn’t work, we will change it. It usually
worked on his favor he was fun and made work fun. When things will not go well, he always had
the right plan and even when his plans didn’t work, he had the right words to lift our spirits.

The other leader that I respected had a more direct approached, he will make changes and when
met resistance it was his way or the highway, but he will work shoulder to shoulder with his team
and he was well respected. During my time working with him things went smooth and you could
always be assured that everything was done fairly.

Both tactics where successful but the fact that the first leader was always willing to hear you out
caused staff to really like him and work for him.

A leader, should always take in consideration the two sides, gather as much information as
possible, and make a balance decision.

Refrence:

Cohen, W. A. (2000). The new art of the leader. U.S.: Prentice Hall Direct.

This study source was downloaded by 100000752579132 from CourseHero.com on 08-09-2021 19:38:07 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/55581174/T1Q2docx/

Th
is

stu
dy

re
so

ur
ce

w
as

sh
ar

ed
v

ia
C

ou
rs

eH
er

o.
co

m

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

https://www.coursehero.com/file/55581174/T1Q2docx/

http://www.tcpdf.org

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by one of our experts, guaranteeing you an A result.

Need an Essay Written?

This sample is available to anyone. If you want a unique paper order it from one of our professional writers.

Get help with your academic paper right away

Quality & Timely Delivery

Free Editing & Plagiarism Check

Security, Privacy & Confidentiality