NEED A PERFECT PAPER? PLACE YOUR FIRST ORDER AND SAVE 15% USING COUPON:

Project Management Process Project Check the uploaded document Project – 2 The journal indicated below describes a national project. Based on the journal,

Project Management Process Project Check the uploaded document Project – 2
The journal indicated below describes a national project. Based on the journal,

Click here to Order a Custom answer to this Question from our writers. It’s fast and plagiarism-free.

Project Management Process Project Check the uploaded document Project – 2
The journal indicated below describes a national project. Based on the journal, and on your team’s understanding of the project, answer the questions below:
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000332  
Journal title: “1976 Montreal Olympics: Case Study of Project Management Failure”

#

Question

Points

1

Was it an internal or external project? Provide rationale.  

2.5

2

Identify at least 10 major stakeholders for the project.

2.5

3

What were the needs or expectation of each stakeholder?

2.5

4

Identify and describe at least 5 most important resources used in the project.

2.5

5

What was the alternative approach for the project (i.e. if the stadium had not been built, what else could have been done to ensure the olympics still occurred)?

2.5

6

Based on (5) above, was building the stadium at this location and at this time the best approach to have been chosen?  Provide rationale using PV, NPV, IRR, B/C. [1 page]

10

7

Provide two Level 3 Work Breakdown Structures (WBS) for this project. These two should be the intial (or planned) and final (or actual) WBS. Explain the difference  [2 pages]

5

8

Based on (7), was there an evidence of scope creep in the project? Provide rationale.

2.5

9

Create one network diagram for the project using the final WBS in (7) above [1 page]

15

10

Use the Level 2 tasks in the final WBS to create one GANTT chart for the project. [1 page]

15

11

Use the initial and final WBS to create two high-level budgets for the project. These two should be the initial and final budgets. Explain the difference. [2 pages]

15

12

Using the risk sources, describe three major (broad) categories of risks in the project.

3

13

Using a table, list at least ten individual risks ranked by severity, and also link each of them to one of the categories in (12) above [1 page]

15

14

For each risk in (13) above, describe at least one thing that was done, or could have been done to mitigate that risk.

2.5

15

Was there adequate quality management processes in place (including quality planning, quality assurance and quality control)? Provide rationale. 

2

16

Was there adequate outsourcing in the project? Provide rationale.

2.5

17

The journal title indicates this project was a failure. Do you agree? Provide rationale. 

2.5

18

If anyone in your group was appointed the project manager for this project, what would you have done differently to make this project successful?

2.5

19

Describe at least five major lessons that can be learned from this project.

2.5

20

Other – Abstract, Introduction, Conclusion (one paragraph each)

5

21

Other – Effective APA (Times New Roman, font size 12, double-spaced, in-text citations, grammar, reference list, etc)

5

22

Other Considerations

2.5

 

TOTAL

120

            Side note from instructor:

1. Your response should be between 15 -20 pages only, including all auxilliary pages such as Title page, Reference page and Table of Content.
2. This research project requires you to tie together the key components of project management.
3. Ensure all responses you provide (including numbers and facts) are supported with information from the journal, or where necessary, provide appropriate assumptions and additional information from external sources. However facts from the journal will trump all external sources. This journal including all other external sources should be correctly referenced.

4. Use effective APA in-text citation to help the reader know exactly where you are picking your facts from. 
5. Your groups should help you bounce off ideas off each other, since no one person knows it all. 
6. If there are any questions or clarifications needed, the PM may contact me. All the best!

Check the journal project and please work on 7-11 questions total 5 questions, charts and graphs add content and follow instructions

Project

2

The

journal

indicated

below

describes

a

national

project.

Based

on

the

journal,

and

on

your

team’s

understanding

of

the

project,

answer

the

questions

below:

DOI:

10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943

5509.0000332

Journal

title:

“1976

Montreal

Olympics:

Case

Study

of

Pro

ject

Management

Failure”

#

Question

Points

1

Was

it

an

internal

or

external

project?

Provide

rationale.

2.5

2

Identify

at

least

10

major

stakeholders

for

the

project.

2.5

3

What

were

the

needs

or

expectation

of

each

stakeholder?

2.5

4

Identify

and

describe

at

least

5

most

important

resources

used

in

the

project.

2.5

5

What

was

the

alternative

approach

for

the

project

(i.e.

if

the

stadium

had

not

been

built,

what

else

could

have

been

done

to

ensure

the

olympics

still

occurred)?

2.5

6

B

ased

on

(5)

above,

was

building

the

stadium

at

this

location

and

at

this

time

the

best

approach

to

have

been

chosen?

Provide

rationale

using

PV,

NPV,

IRR,

B/C.

[1

page]

10

7

Provide

two

Level

3

Work

Breakdown

Structures

(WBS)

for

this

project.

These

two

should

be

the

intial

(or

planned)

and

final

(or

actual)

WBS.

Explain

the

difference

[2

pages]

5

8

Based

on

(7),

was

there

an

evidence

of

scope

creep

in

the

project?

Provide

rationale.

2.5

9

Create

one

network

diagram

for

the

project

using

the

final

WBS

in

(7)

above

[1

page]

15

10

Use

the

Level

2

tasks

in

the

final

WBS

to

create

one

GANTT

chart

for

the

project.

[1

page]

15

11

Use

the

initial

and

final

WBS

to

create

two

high

level

budgets

for

the

project.

These

two

should

be

the

initial

and

final

budgets.

Explain

the

difference.

[2

pages]

15

12

Using

the

risk

sources,

describe

three

major

(broad)

categories

of

risks

in

the

proj

ect.

3

13

Using

a

table,

list

at

least

ten

individual

risks

ranked

by

severity,

and

also

link

each

of

them

to

one

of

the

categories

in

(12)

above

[1

page]

15

14

For

each

risk

in

(13)

above,

describe

at

least

one

thing

that

was

done,

or

could

have

been

do

ne

to

mitigate

that

risk.

2.5

15

Was

there

adequate

quality

management

processes

in

place

(including

quality

planning,

quality

assurance

and

quality

control)?

Provide

rationale.

2

Project – 2
The journal indicated below describes a national project. Based on the journal, and on
your team’s understanding of the project, answer the questions below:
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000332
Journal title: “1976 Montreal Olympics: Case Study of Project Management Failure”
# Question Points
1 Was it an internal or external project? Provide rationale. 2.5
2 Identify at least 10 major stakeholders for the project. 2.5
3 What were the needs or expectation of each stakeholder? 2.5
4 Identify and describe at least 5 most important resources used in the project. 2.5
5
What was the alternative approach for the project (i.e. if the stadium had not been
built, what else could have been done to ensure the olympics still occurred)?
2.5
6
Based on (5) above, was building the stadium at this location and at this time the
best approach to have been chosen? Provide rationale using PV, NPV, IRR,
B/C. [1 page]
10
7
Provide two Level 3 Work Breakdown Structures (WBS) for this project. These
two should be the intial (or planned) and final (or actual) WBS. Explain the
difference [2 pages]
5
8
Based on (7), was there an evidence of scope creep in the project? Provide
rationale.
2.5
9
Create one network diagram for the project using the final WBS in (7) above [1
page]
15
10
Use the Level 2 tasks in the final WBS to create one GANTT chart for the
project. [1 page]
15
11
Use the initial and final WBS to create two high-level budgets for the project.
These two should be the initial and final budgets. Explain the difference. [2
pages]
15
12
Using the risk sources, describe three major (broad) categories of risks in the
project.
3
13
Using a table, list at least ten individual risks ranked by severity, and also link
each of them to one of the categories in (12) above [1 page]
15
14
For each risk in (13) above, describe at least one thing that was done, or could
have been done to mitigate that risk.
2.5
15
Was there adequate quality management processes in place (including quality
planning, quality assurance and quality control)? Provide rationale.
2

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by one of our experts, guaranteeing you an A result.

Need an Essay Written?

This sample is available to anyone. If you want a unique paper order it from one of our professional writers.

Get help with your academic paper right away

Quality & Timely Delivery

Free Editing & Plagiarism Check

Security, Privacy & Confidentiality