NEED A PERFECT PAPER? PLACE YOUR FIRST ORDER AND SAVE 15% USING COUPON:

Unit IV Discussion Board BL

Unit IV Discussion Board BL

Click here to Order a Custom answer to this Question from our writers. It’s fast and plagiarism-free.

As a general rule, the law says that a minor, a person under the age of 18 in most states, can disaffirm or cancel a contract they have made because anyone under the age of 18 is presumed to lack the knowledge and experience necessary to understand the obligations that a contract they have made imposes on them. 

Does that rule make sense? Is that rule too broad?
Clearly, there are individuals who are younger than 18 years of age who understand the obligations that are assumed in a contract.
If the rule did not exist, and courts had to consider every contract that a minor made and then wanted to disaffirm, the courts would be more crowded than they already are. Is the rule really a rule of convenience intended to relieve the courts of having to deal with deciding if minors knew what they were doing when they entered into a contract? Should this rule be discarded or modified?

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by one of our experts, guaranteeing you an A result.

Need an Essay Written?

This sample is available to anyone. If you want a unique paper order it from one of our professional writers.

Get help with your academic paper right away

Quality & Timely Delivery

Free Editing & Plagiarism Check

Security, Privacy & Confidentiality